This solution is essentially an application of the doctrine of double effectwhich says that you may take action which has bad side effects, but deliberately intending harm even for good causes is wrong.
Other approaches make use of virtual reality to assess human behavior in experimental settings. One clear distinction is that in the first case, one does not intend harm towards anyone — harming the one is just a side effect of switching the trolley away from the five. In this regard, many parents are The fat man problem essay worried due to their over-weight and obese children, and thus, it has now become imperative for healthcare organizations to provide awareness and offer interventions that may help them in reducing obesity in their children.
It is an imperative in that it issues commands or rules to us. Criticism[ edit ] In a paper published in the Social and Personality Psychology Compass,  researchers criticized the use of the trolley problem, arguing, among other things, that the scenario it presents is too extreme and unconnected to real-life moral situations to be useful or educational.
If a decision is not made within a certain period of time, the king announces that the player has five seconds to make up their mind, "or they all die. In the case of the Fat Man problem, by using the same reasoning, you would push the fat man off the train to save move lives.
Marcus, In this regard, parents will have to play a vital role in guiding and limiting such hours and involve their children in activities that may require physical movement, such as sports, gardening, etc. Specifically, this paper will endeavor to identify some of the treatments or strategies that may reduce obesity in the children.
Unger also considers cases which are more complex than the original trolley problem, involving more than just two results. But notice that in both the original Trolley problem and the Fat Man problem, the choice of the person, is one life against 5 lives.
It may well be considered noble to sacrifice your own life to protect others, but morally or legally allowing murder of one innocent person to save five people may be insufficient justification.
According to classical utilitarianism, such a decision would be not only permissible, but, morally speaking, the better option the other option being no action at all.
If we were purely concerned with total lives saved, then not changing the direction of the tracks and not pushing the Fat Man should be morally the same, while changing the direction of the tracks and pushing the Fat Man should also be morally the same.
On these grounds, they advocate for the dual-process account of moral decision-making. To make the parallel as close as possible it may rather be supposed that he is the driver of a runaway tram which he can only steer from one narrow track on to another; five men are working on one track and one man on the other; anyone on the track he enters is bound to be killed.
This approach requires that we downplay the moral difference between doing and allowing.
Its use is not trivial and it serves as a working metaphor for the rest of the game. In popular culture[ edit ] In an urban legend that has existed since at least the mids, the decision must be made by a drawbridge keeper who must choose between sacrificing a passenger train or his own four-year-old son.
Costa in his article "Another Trip on the Trolley", where he points out that if we fail to act in this scenario we will effectively be allowing the five to become a means to save the one.
If this is the case, then deciding to do nothing would be considered an immoral act if one values five lives more than one.
An opponent of action may also point to the incommensurability of human lives. The initial trolley problem also supports comparison to other, related, dilemmas: School can contribute effectively in such attempt, and it is important that schools should provide physical education during school hours that may reduce physical inactivity, and thus, obesity as well.
Elimination of all such dietary habits can play a pivotal role in reducing obesity in children. Unger claims that people therefore believe the man is not "fair game", but says that this lack of involvement in the scenario cannot make a moral difference.Obesity in Children Essay Sample.
Obesity means excess of fat in the human body. Such a medical problem was just limited to adults; however, many children are nowadays suffering from obesity due to a number of genetic, dietary, socio-economic, and physical factors, such as an obese parent, higher consuming of fast food and sugary drinks.
Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more.
Get started now! The Fat Man problem Essay Sample. This is known as the Fat Man problem. What is the morally best option or better option here? The majority of people, when presented with this thought experiment, insist that when you do not push, it’s the morally better option, and some say it’s the required option.
TruthFinder gives you access to details about the people in your life. Access public.
Thomsons Argument Of The Trolley Problem Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: pushing and harming the large man is the only way to save the five people on the trolley.
in contrast, Thomson argues that a key distinction between the first trolley problem and the second case is that in the first case, you simply redirect the. Nov 24, · WOULD YOU KILL THE FAT MAN?
The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us About Right and Wrong. By David Edmonds. Illustrated. pp. Princeton University Press. $Download